Accéder à l'en-tête Accéder au contenu principal Accéder au pied de page

Several laboratory studies have shown that students’ understanding of arithmetic can be improved through certain number-based games. This raises the question: would simply encouraging students to play such games during the summer improve their academic performance when they return to school? A randomized controlled trial conducted by the CSEN, entitled Well Played Summer 2021, showed that distributing games before the summer holidays does not improve academic achievement.

This study highlights the value of experimentation, even when the results are negative. Without such evidence, it might have been tempting to distribute games to all students, and the ineffectiveness of this measure would never have been recognized.

This report was written by Marie Lubineau, Stanislas Dehaene, Cassandra Potier-Watkins, Marc Gurgand, Adrien Pawlik, Caroline Bévalot, and Nathan Viltard.

Abstract

Several laboratory studies have show that student’s understanding of arithmetic could be enhanced through games involving numerical content. Thus, could encouraging students to play such games over the summer be enough to improve their achievement when they return to school ? In collaboration with the French Federation of Bridge, thousands of children in their first year of primary school (CP) received, right before the summer holidays, a card game called « Le petit bridge » and a board game called « Lianes et cascades ». A hundred voluntary schools, all located in priority education areas (REP/REP+) in 4 highly disadvantaged departments (Guadeloupe, Nord, Pas de Calais and La Réunion) were randomly assigned either to the experimental schools’ group (receiving the games) or to the control schools’ group (without the games). Students in the intervention schools received the games during the final week of CP (at the end of June 2021) and could play briefly in class before going home with the games. At the end of the holidays, at the beginning of their second year of primary school (CE1), their progress was assessed using the national evaluations (the Evalaide program) and a survey.

Results have shown that :

  • Students who received the games reported greater confidence in their abilities in both mathematics and reading
  • Many reported playing the games daily or weekly, particularly those who had initially performed least well in mathematics and language.
  • However, on average, pupils who received the games did not outperform pupils in the control group after the summer break, either in mathematics or in language skills. Nor did they display higher levels of school motivation or lower levels of anxiety.
  • Several factors may account for this limited impact. One possible explanation is the limited amount of time available before the school holidays to teach sophisticated games. Consequently, it seems likely that those stronger effects might be obtained by integrating the games into classroom activities throughout the school year, within a structured educational approach that teaches not only the rules of the games but also the mathematical concepts and forms of reasoning on which they are based. Such an initiative, known as the « Oiseaux compteurs » is currently under way.

This study highlights the importance of rigorous experimentation, even when the results are negative. Without such evidence, it might have been tempting to distribute games to all students, and the ineffectiveness of the intervention would likely have remained unnoticed.

 

Key takeaways

  • Educational experimentation makes it possible to draw rigorous conclusions about the effects of an intervention. When several small-scale studies suggest that an intervention may be effective, it is important to test this hypothesis on a larger scale through a randomized controlled trial. 
  • An experiment is always valuable, even when its findings are negative. 
  • Distributing games increased pupils’ subjective confidence in their abilities, but did not improve their objective outcomes in the short term. Pupils who received the games made no greater progress than those in the control group, either in mathematics or in language skills. Nor were they less anxious or more motivated towards school. 
  • Pupils who used the games during the summer were also those with the lowest levels of achievement in both mathematics and language. However, the experiment did not establish whether this correlation reflects a causal relationship. 
  • Distributing the games earlier in the school year, allowing them to be integrated into everyday classroom practice, may prove more effective, particularly if it helps engage pupils who experience the greatest difficulties in entering the learning process. Testing this hypothesis through a randomized controlled trial is precisely the aim of the Les Oiseaux Compteurs project. 

S'abonner à la Lettre du Passeurs

« * » indique les champs nécessaires

Format attendu : nom@domaine.fr
Votre adresse de messagerie est uniquement utilisée pour vous envoyer les lettres d'information du CSEN. Vous pouvez à tout moment utiliser le lien de désabonnement intégré dans la lettre d'information. En savoir plus sur la gestion de vos données et vos droits