Accéder à l'en-tête Accéder au contenu principal Accéder au pied de page

Nearly one in two students entering second grade reads less than 50 words per minute, the grade-level expectation. And one in five falls far below that expectation, reading less than 25 words per minute. These results raise questions about the effectiveness of current reading instruction methods employed in France.

The Formalect survey, conducted in 2021 on a large representative sample of first-grade classes, sought to address the following questions: What teaching methods for learning to read are currently employed in France at the beginning of first grade? And what is the impact of these different teaching methods on students’ reading skills?  The purpose of this note written by Jérôme Deauvieau and Paul Gioia is to provide a synthetic answer to these two questions.

Abstract

Nearly one in two students entering second grade reads less than 50 words per minute, the grade-level expectation. And one in five falls far below that expectation, reading less than 25 words per minute. These results raise questions about the effectiveness of current reading instruction methods employed in France.

The Formalect survey, conducted in 2021 on a large representative sample of first-grade classes, sought to address the following questions: What teaching methods for learning to read are currently employed in France at the beginning of first grade? And what is the impact of these different teaching methods on students’ reading skills?

 

The purpose of this note is to provide a synthetic answer to these two questions. The findings of the Formalect survey show that implementing a strict synthetic phonics method — that is to say, a method focused on teaching the code of graphemephoneme correspondences, without any accompanying memorization activities or global recognition of non-decodable words — is more effective for the acquisition of good fluency and reading comprehension. The difference in effectiveness becomes apparent as early as January of first grade and persists through September of second grade. The discrepancy is even more pronounced for students with weak pre-reading skills at the beginning of first grade, and for those attending schools from low-income backgrounds.

Given that this strict synthetic phonics method is currently rarely employed in classes, there is a significant scope for progress in reading instruction in France.

Key takeaways

  • The strict synthetic phonics method, i.e. teaching the code of grapheme-phoneme correspondences without any memorization activities or global recognition of nondecodable words, is more effective than the mixed phonics method for acquiring fluency
    and understanding of written texts.

 

  • The difference in effectiveness between methods is particularly pronounced for students who enter first grade with a poor knowledge of the alphabetic principle and for those attending low-income schools.

 

  • Currently, the strict synthetic phonics method is rarely employed in classes. The scope for progress in reading instruction is therefore considerable.

 

  • A first level of action would be to better regulate the selection of textbooks in reading instruction.

 

  • A second level of action would be to provide better support for teachers in implementing more effective pedagogical practices in reading instruction. The CSEN advocates for a very substantial investment in the initial training of teachers and their subsequent professional development.

Further reading

S'abonner à la Lettre du Passeurs

« * » indique les champs nécessaires

Format attendu : nom@domaine.fr
Votre adresse de messagerie est uniquement utilisée pour vous envoyer les lettres d'information du CSEN. Vous pouvez à tout moment utiliser le lien de désabonnement intégré dans la lettre d'information. En savoir plus sur la gestion de vos données et vos droits